# Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir Petrow

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · April 10, 1967 · 376 F.2d 936

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9452712

## Case

- **Full name:** Application of David Neville KIRK and Vladimir Petrow
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** April 10, 1967
- **Citations:** 376 F.2d 936; 54 C.C.P.A. 1119
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Smith
- **Judges:** Rich, Smith, Worley, Almond, Kirkpatrick
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9452712

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that a “person skilled in the art” is commonly defined as “a typical inventor or designer active in the relevant field”
- noting Application of Adams, 50 C.C.P.A. 1185, 316 F.2d 476, 478-80 (1963) (Martin, J., concurring and dissenting)
- rejecting intermediaries for steroids with no known use
- noting how Manson mandated the overruling of Nelson

## Opinion text

SMITH, Judge
(dissenting).
Our usual practice is to release the majority opinion simultaneously with any dissenting opinions. There has been an unwarranted departure from this procedure in this case, the effect of which is to preclude an expression of my views at this time. I am unable to see wherein the cause of justice is served by such an irregular procedure. This dissent is therefore 1) a protest to the procedure here adopted, and 2) a notice that my full written dissent will be forthcoming as soon as the pressures of court work permit.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9452712. Public record. Not legal advice.