# General Precision, Inc. v. Tab T. Thein, by Change of Name From Tibor J. Thein, D.B.A. Lib-Re-Search Service

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · March 12, 1964 · 328 F.2d 627

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9449899

## Case

- **Full name:** GENERAL PRECISION, INC., Appellant, v. Tab T. THEIN, by Change of Name From Tibor J. Thein, D.B.A. Lib-Re-Search Service, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** March 12, 1964
- **Citations:** 328 F.2d 627; 51 C.C.P.A. 1064
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Smith
- **Judges:** Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Almond
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9449899

## Opinion text

SMITH, Judge (concurring).
The differences in sound, appearance and suggestive connotation of the marks in issue are sufficient, in my opinion, to warrant affirmance of the board’s decision without considering the differences in the goods and without relying on the so-called “discriminating purchaser” theory.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9449899. Public record. Not legal advice.
