# Creola Quick, Administratrix, Estate of Lawrence Quick, Deceased v. Roger G. Thurston

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · April 20, 1961 · 290 F.2d 360

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9447936

## Case

- **Full name:** Creola QUICK, Administratrix, Estate of Lawrence Quick, Deceased, Appellant v. Roger G. THURSTON, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** April 20, 1961
- **Citations:** 290 F.2d 360; 110 U.S. App. D.C. 169; 88 A.L.R. 2d 299; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4755
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Bazelon
- **Judges:** Edgerton, Bazelon, Fahy, Miller, Prettyman, Washington, Danaher, Bastían, Burger
- **Cited by:** 27 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9447936

## Opinion text

BAZELON, Circuit Judge
(dissenting separately).
I agree with Judge Edgerton’s analysis of the testimony. And having in mind that we must view the record most favorably to plaintiff, I think it does not provide a provident basis for directing a verdict in favor of the defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case. But this does not foreclose the possibility that such a basis may appear after defendant puts in his case. Cf. Loketch v. Capital Transit Co., 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 287 , 289, 248 F.2d 609, 611 , citing Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 1953, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 202 , 204 F.2d 391, 396 , 44 A.L.R.2d 671 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9447936. Public record. Not legal advice.
