# Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · March 15, 1960 · 275 F.2d 955

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9447260

## Case

- **Full name:** Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** March 15, 1960
- **Citations:** 275 F.2d 955; 47 C.C.P.A. 844
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Worley
- **Judges:** Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Van Dusen
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9447260

## Opinion text

WORLEY, Chief Judge
(dissenting).
I agree with the concurring decisions of the Examiner of Interferences and the Assistant Commissioner that the differences between the marks and their manner of use are such that there would be no likelihood of confusion. I would affirm.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9447260. Public record. Not legal advice.