# Albert Stain v. United States

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · June 15, 1956 · 235 F.2d 339

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9445219

## Case

- **Full name:** Albert STAIN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 15, 1956
- **Citations:** 235 F.2d 339; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3869
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Chambers
- **Judges:** Stephens, Bone, Chambers
- **Cited by:** 32 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9445219

## Opinion text

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge
(concurring).
It is apparent to me that the trial judge who saw and heard Stain on the witness stand concluded from Stain’s testimony that Stain’s claim of conscientious objection and inability to under *344 stand the selective service proceedings was a sham. In this, the trial judge should have every intendment. However, under the particular circumstances here, I concur that the local board did not give the defendant due process.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9445219. Public record. Not legal advice.