# Rent v. United States

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · February 12, 1954 · 209 F.2d 893

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444048

## Case

- **Full name:** RENT Et Al. v. UNITED STATES
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 12, 1954
- **Citations:** 209 F.2d 893
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Russell
- **Judges:** Russell, Holmes, Rives
- **Cited by:** 71 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444048

## Opinion text

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. Following Rent’s arrest, which we all agree was a legal one, the automobile was on the street without its owner or any caretaker. It was only proper that the officers take possession of it. Such possession was therefore entirely legal whether or not it be considered the consequence of the seizure of a car. Vagueness as to the time of actual seizure of the car is immaterial. The statute requires no precise ritual of seizure. Under all of the circumstances of this case, the delay in making search for the fruits and evidence of the crime for which Rent had been arrested, did not, in my opinion, require the trial court to find that the search was unreasonable as a matter of law. As to whether Curry "possessed” the marihuana cigarette which he picked up from the ground, I think the question was properly submitted to the jury for determination and, possession being adjudged, there arose the statutory presumption of guilt, which was in no way controverted. 26 U.S.C.A. § 2593 (a). Compare Aeby v. United States, 5 Cir., 206 F.2d 296 ; Henderson v. United States, 5 Cir., 206 F.2d 300 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444048. Public record. Not legal advice.