# National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Dry Goods Corp. (Lord & Taylor Division)

> Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · January 5, 1954 · 209 F.2d 593

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444029

## Case

- **Full name:** National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Dry Goods Corp. (Lord & Taylor Division)
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- **Decided:** January 5, 1954
- **Citations:** 209 F.2d 593; 33 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2338; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3714
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Clark
- **Judges:** Clark, Chase, Brennan
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444029

## Opinion text

CLARK, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
In N. L. R. B. v. Syracuse Color Press, Inc., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 596 , we have upheld the Board in finding coercion in the pointed cross-examination of five employees as to union organizing activities within the plant. It seems to me the present case, involving persistent questioning along the same line of a single key employee, comes within essentially the same rationale. For my part I do not see a distinction of law between “the aroma of coercion” affecting one union member over a period of some months and that affecting several employees substantially all at one time. In either case there would seem to be a sound basis in the evidence from which the Board could and should draw such conclusions as in the light of its experience and responsibility it felt the circumstances to require. I would grant enforcement of the order.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444029. Public record. Not legal advice.