# Victor Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · July 16, 1953 · 208 F.2d 834

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444003

## Case

- **Full name:** Victor Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** July 16, 1953
- **Citations:** 208 F.2d 834; 93 U.S. App. D.C. 56; 32 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2445; 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3743
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Edgerton
- **Judges:** Edgerton, Miller, Prettyman
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444003

## Opinion text

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
I think the Board’s finding is supported, upon the record as a whole, by very substantial evidence. In my opinion the discharge slips strongly corroborate Hartsock. The words “forcibly blocking entrance to the plant” seem to me to de *840 scribe the Steeley incident and nothing else. Certainly the Board might reasonably understand these words in this way. If the words are so understood, the Board’s finding has ample support. In deference to my brethren I concede that the words might reasonably be understood in a different way, but this does not mean that the Board’s finding lacks support. The “requirement for canvassing ‘the whole record’ in order to ascertain substantiality does not * * * mean that * * * a court may displace the Board’s choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo.” Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 465 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9444003. Public record. Not legal advice.