# Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States (Two Cases). Aktiebolaget Bofors v. Acheson, Secretary of State

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · November 29, 1951 · 194 F.2d 145

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9443090

## Case

- **Full name:** AKTIEBOLAGET BOFORS v. UNITED STATES (Two Cases); AKTIEBOLAGET BOFORS v. ACHESON, Secretary of State, Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** November 29, 1951
- **Citations:** 194 F.2d 145; 90 U.S. App. D.C. 92; 91 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 285; 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3634
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Fahy
- **Judges:** Clark, Fahy, Miller, Wilbur
- **Cited by:** 43 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9443090

## Opinion text

FAHY, Circuit Judge.
I concur in the result. In No. 10870, however, I think we should leave to the court having jurisdiction of the contract issue the question whether or not a cause of action for breach of contract is stated.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9443090. Public record. Not legal advice.
