# Stauffer v. Exley

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · November 22, 1950 · 184 F.2d 962

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9442624

## Case

- **Full name:** STAUFFER Et Al. v. EXLEY
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 22, 1950
- **Citations:** 184 F.2d 962
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Denman
- **Judges:** Denman, Orr, Pope
- **Cited by:** 92 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9442624

## Opinion text

DENMAN, Chief Judge
(dissenting).
The petition for rehearing should be granted.
This court should not create against appellee an issue not in the record, thus giving, her opponents two bites at the cherry.
The compulsion-of .appellants’ payment of costs while giving them a reversal tells the story, for they chose to litigate the appeal without the transcript of the proceeding the district court is ordered to repeat.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9442624. Public record. Not legal advice.