# Moore v. Hartman

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · July 15, 2011 · 644 F.3d 415

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9441997

## Case

- **Full name:** William G. MOORE, Jr. Et Al., Appellees v. Michael HARTMAN Et Al., Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** July 15, 2011
- **Citations:** 644 F.3d 415; 396 U.S. App. D.C. 28; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14505; 2011 WL 2739835
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Henderson
- **Judges:** Henderson, Rogers, Kavanaugh
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Vacated on other grounds by Hartman v. Moore, 567 U.S. 901 (2012).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9441997

## Opinion text

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
I write separately to express dismay over the herculean effort the plaintiff has had to expend simply to get his day in court. It has taken twenty-five years, a criminal trial, eleven appellate judges as well as all participating members of the United States Supreme Court — not one of whom has rejected his claim as a matter of law — to get to the point that a jury will finally hear and decide if government officials engaged in pay-back because the plaintiff sought to do business with the government. To say that this has not been the government’s finest hour is a colossal, and lamentable, understatement.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9441997. Public record. Not legal advice.