# Pedroza v. BRB

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · October 20, 2010 · 624 F.3d 926

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9438512

## Case

- **Full name:** Jose PEDROZA, Petitioner, v. BRB; Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs; National Steel & Shipbuilding Company, Respondents
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 20, 2010
- **Citations:** 624 F.3d 926; 2010 A.M.C. 2491; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 27063; 2010 WL 4105067
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Pregerson
- **Judges:** Pregerson, Smith, Collins
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9438512

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining “an unpublished decision is not precedent”

## Opinion text

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge,
concurring specially:
I write separately to emphasize that our holding concerns legitimate personnel actions, and not employer conduct that is in any way hostile, vindictive, malicious, mean, insensitive, crude, or abusive.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9438512. Public record. Not legal advice.