# International Typographical Union v. National Labor Relations Board

> Supreme Court of the United States · May 29, 1961 · 365 U.S. 705

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9422172

## Case

- **Full name:** INTERNATIONAL TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Et Al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
- **Court:** Supreme Court of the United States
- **Decided:** May 29, 1961
- **Citations:** 365 U.S. 705; 81 S. Ct. 855; 6 L. Ed. 2d 36; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 2031
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Clark
- **Judges:** Douglas, Clark, Whittaker, Harlan, Frankfurter, Stewart
- **Cited by:** 32 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9422172

## Opinion text

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Whittaker
dissent, substantially for the reasons stated by the Court of Appeals, 278 F. 2d 6 .
We turn then to the controversy over the “foreman clause.” As to whether the strike to obtain the “foreman clause” was permissible, the Court is equally divided. Accordingly the judgment on that phase of the controversy is affirmed.
Reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9422172. Public record. Not legal advice.