# Wright v. Southland Corporation

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · September 3, 1999 · 187 F.3d 1287

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9415502

## Case

- **Full name:** James D. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation Authorized to Do Business in the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** September 3, 1999
- **Citations:** 187 F.3d 1287; 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,292; 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1280; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21021
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Hull
- **Judges:** Tjoflat, Cox, Hull
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9415502

## Opinion text

HULL, Circuit Judge, specially
concurring:
I agree that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendant in this case but I concur only in the result reached by Judge Tjoflat’s opinion. The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a jury issue regarding both age discrimination and retaliation. Judge Tjoflat’s opinion correctly vacates the judgment of the district court and correctly remands plaintiffs claims for a trial.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9415502. Public record. Not legal advice.