# United States v. Maragh

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 6, 1999 · 174 F.3d 1202

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9415474

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juliet MARAGH, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** May 6, 1999
- **Citations:** 174 F.3d 1202; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hatchett
- **Judges:** Hatchett, Barkett, Roney
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Yellow flag:** Modified on other grounds by United States v. Juliet Maragh, 189 F.3d 1315 (1999).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9415474

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding “consent is of paramount importance” in determining the duties the district court could delegate to a magistrate judge

## Opinion text

HATCHETT, Chief Judge,
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent because I would not remand the case for an evidentiary hearing, but reverse holding that the magistrate judge must obtain the defendant’s consent, on the record, before conducting voir due.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9415474. Public record. Not legal advice.