# Uniroyal Chemical Co. v. Deltech Corp.

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · December 3, 1998 · 160 F.3d 238

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9413864

## Case

- **Full name:** UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTECH CORP.; Et Al., Defendants, Safeway Transportation, Inc.; TMI Enterprise, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 3, 1998
- **Citations:** 160 F.3d 238; 1998 WL 781242
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by DeMOSS
- **Judges:** Magill, Smith, Demoss
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Yellow flag:** Modified by Uniroyal Chem Co Inc v. Deltech Corp, 160 F.3d 238 (1999).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9413864

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Jan. 8, 1999
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:
Construing the Suggestion for Rehearing en Banc of Defendants-Appellees Safeway Transportation, Inc., and TMI Enterprises, Inc., as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, we conclude that the petition is due to be GRANTED-IN-PART as follows. The last sentence in the introduction is revised from “We vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this action for entry of judgment in favor of Uniroyal,” to read ‘We vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this action for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.” Also, the last sentence in the opinion’s conclusion is revised from “Based on the foregoing, we VACATE the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to the defendants, and REMAND to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of Uniroyal as to CERCLA liability, and such further proceedings as to damages as may be required,” to read “Based on the foregoing, we VACATE the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to the defendants, and REMAND to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.” Other than those two modifications, our opinion remains unchanged.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9413864. Public record. Not legal advice.