# Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLC

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · July 3, 2023 · 71 F.4th 1200

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9406725

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 3, 2023
- **Citations:** 71 F.4th 1200
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9406725

## Opinion text

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700
ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ;
BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. 4:16-
and as Administrator of the Estate of cv-03282-DMR
Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE
HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ;
PAUL GONZALEZ,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

GOOGLE, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 3, 2023

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Marsha S. Berzon, and Morgan
Christen, Circuit Judges.

Order
2 GONZALEZ V. GOOGLE

SUMMARY *

Anti-Terrorism Act

The panel remanded this case to the district court for
further proceedings consistent with Gonzalez v. Google
LLC, 143 S. Ct. 1191 (2023) (per curiam).

COUNSEL

Keith L. Altman (argued), The Law Office of Keith Altman,
Farmington Hills, Michigan; Daniel W. Weininger, Excolo
Law, Southfield, Michigan, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Reynaldo Gonzalez.
Robert J. Tolchin (argued) and Meir Katz, The Berkman
Law Office LLC, Brooklyn, New York, for Plaintiffs-
Appellants the Estate of Nohemi Gonzalez, Beatriz
Gonzalez, Jose Hernandez, Rey Gonzalez, and Paul
Gonzalez.
Brian M. Willen (argued), Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati New York, New York; David H. Kramer and Kelly
M. Knoll, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto,
California; Lauren Gallo White, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati, San Francisco, California; Paul Harold and Steffen
N. Johnson, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Washington, D.C.; for Defendant-Appellee.

*
This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has
been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.
GONZALEZ V. GOOGLE 3

Aaron D. Mackley and Sophia Cope, Electronic Frontier
Foundation, San Francisco, California, for Amicus Curiae
Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Yavar Bathaee, Bathaee Dunne LLP, Austin, Texas; Brian J.
Dunne, Bathaee Dunne LLP, Los Angeles, California; for
Amici Curiae Artificial Intelligence Law and Policy
Institute.

ORDER

This case is REMANDED to the district court for further
proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme
Court’s opinion in Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 143 S. Ct. 1191
(2023) (per curiam).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9406725. Public record. Not legal advice.