# Offie Brown, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 21, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9404387

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 21, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9404387

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6048 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6048

OFFIE CURTIS BROWN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; JOE BIDEN; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; CRAVEN
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; CENTRAL PRISON; MAURY
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; CHERRY HOSPITAL; NEW BERN POLICE
DEPARTMENT; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; DORTHEA DIX HOSPITAL;
CRAVEN COUNTY JAIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03165-FL)

Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 21, 2023

Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Offie Curtis Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6048 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6048 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Offie Curtis Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Brown v.

N.C. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, No. 5:22-ct-03165-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2022). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9404387. Public record. Not legal advice.