# Jenam Tech, LLC v. Google LLC

> Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · April 11, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9386110

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- **Decided:** April 11, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9386110

## Opinion text

Case: 22-1085 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2023

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________

JENAM TECH, LLC,
Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,
Appellee

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF
COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor
______________________

2022-1085
______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-
00845.
______________________

JUDGMENT
______________________

DEREK DAHLGREN, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington,
DE, argued for appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY
DEVLIN.
Case: 22-1085 Document: 59 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2023

NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC,
argued for appellee. Also represented by QUADEER AHMED,
STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS.

ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for interve-
nor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, BRIAN
RACILLA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 11, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9386110. Public record. Not legal advice.