# United States v. Christopher Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 21, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9381462

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 21, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9381462

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7127 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7127

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER DONNELL BROWN, a/k/a Stymie, a/k/a Stimey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:17-cr-00350-JFA-1)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Donnell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant
United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7127 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Donnell Brown appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion

to correct a clerical error in his presentence report and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 3:17-cr-

00350-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2022; Sept. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9381462. Public record. Not legal advice.