# Wagner v. United States Solicitor General

> District Court, District of Columbia · January 19, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9364633

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** January 19, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judge Christopher R. Cooper
- **Nature of suit:** Civil
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9364633

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MICHAEL L. WAGNER, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 22-2571 (UNA)
)
UNITED STATES SOLICITOR GENERAL, )
)
Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis (ECF No. 3) and for the reasons discussed below, DISMISSES the complaint (ECF No.

1) and this civil action without prejudice.

A pro se litigant’s pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to a

formal pleading drafted by lawyer. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro

se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s

jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled

to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The

purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim

being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense, and to

determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498

(D.D.C. 1977).

1
As drafted, plaintiff’s complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in

Rule 8(a). According to plaintiff, antibacterial soaps and chemicals in disposable diapers are

toxic, and he demands that this Court “Order a Total-Ban of Antibacterial Soap and Disposable

Diapers containing dangerous chemicals.” Compl. at 1. Missing from the complaint is a short

and plain statement of a viable legal claim for relief this Court may order. Therefore, the Court

will dismiss the complaint and this civil action without prejudice. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: January 19, 2023 /s/
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER
United States District Judge

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9364633. Public record. Not legal advice.