# United States v. Jamel Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 10, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9353460

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 10, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9353460

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- declining to consider issues raised for first time on appeal

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6491 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6491

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMEL CHAWLONE BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00259-1)

Submitted: December 28, 2022 Decided: January 10, 2023

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamel Chawlone Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6491 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/10/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jamel Chawlone Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown,

No. 3:08-cr-00259-1 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 13, 2022); see also First Virginia Banks, Inc. v. BP

Exploration & Oil, Inc., 206 F.3d 404, 407 n.1 (4th Cir. 2000) (declining to consider issues

raised for first time on appeal). We deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9353460. Public record. Not legal advice.