# FRANCISCA R. ROZAS CRISTINO v. JERMAINE ANDERSON

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · January 4, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9351983

## Case

- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** January 4, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9351983

## Opinion text

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed January 4, 2023.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-844
Lower Tribunal No. 18-41136
________________

Francisca R. Rozas Cristino,
Appellant,

vs.

Jermaine Anderson,
Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark
Blumstein, Judge.

Law Offices of Lazaro Lopez, and Lazaro Lopez, for appellant.

The Brown Law Group, LLC, and Vincent T. Brown, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925,

928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher
court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal

argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that

presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” (quoting Tillman v.

State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985))).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9351983. Public record. Not legal advice.