# Davis v. Chattanooga Union Ry. Co.

> U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · January 1, 1895 · 65 F. 359

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9306932

## Case

- **Full name:** DAVIS v. CHATTANOOGA UNION RY. CO. FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO. v. SAME
- **Court:** U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee
- **Decided:** January 1, 1895
- **Citations:** 65 F. 359; 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2989
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Key
- **Judges:** Key, Lurton
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9306932

## Opinion text

KEY, District Judge.
I concur fully with Judge LUETON. In addition, I will state that the litigation out of which these questions arise has all been conducted before me, as judge. The case has been hotly contested from the beginning, and the attorneys of all parties have ably and zealously maintained in open court the interests of their respective clients. No quarter has been asked or given, so far. as I could see;, but all the attorneys, in my opinion, have been *369 faithful to the interests of their clients. The cause has very often been before the court, and it has seemed to me that there has been more contention than necessary. I have never seen the slightest disposition on the part of any of the counsel in the case to compromise or surrender any interest or advantage of their clients.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9306932. Public record. Not legal advice.