# AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board

> Supreme Court of the United States · May 26, 1998 · 523 U.S. 1135

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9164495

## Case

- **Full name:** AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board and AT&T Corp. v. California MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board and MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. California Association for Local Telecommunications Services v. Iowa Utilities Board Federal Communications Commission v. Iowa Utilities Board and Federal Communications Commission v. California Ameritech Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission GTE Midwest Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission U S WEST, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
- **Court:** Supreme Court of the United States
- **Decided:** May 26, 1998
- **Citations:** 523 U.S. 1135; 118 S. Ct. 1837
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Consideration, Motions, Took
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9164495

## Opinion text

C. A. *1136 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1089.] Motion of local exchange carriers regarding oral argument granted. Two hours are allotted for oral argument; the first hour is limited to the jurisdictional issue, and the second hour is limited to the nonjuris-dietional issues. Divided argument is granted with respect to the jurisdictional issue to be divided as follows: petitioners/cross-respondents, 30 minutes; state respondents/cross-petitioners, 15 minutes; private respondents/eross-petitioners, 15 minutes. Motion of respondent California for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9164495. Public record. Not legal advice.