# In re Wirebound Boxes Antitrust Litigation

> District Court, D. Minnesota · April 9, 1990 · 131 F.R.D. 578

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9031329

## Case

- **Full name:** In re WIREBOUND BOXES ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This document relates to: All Cases
- **Court:** District Court, D. Minnesota
- **Decided:** April 9, 1990
- **Citations:** 131 F.R.D. 578; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14949; 1990 WL 96398
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Murphy
- **Judges:** Murphy
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9031329

## Opinion text

ORDER 21
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
In response to Order 20, plaintiffs have stated to the court that they “do not and will not seek to recover lost profits,” and that their damages will be measured in this price-fixing case by “calculating the extent of unlawful overcharges imposed by defendants.” Based on these statements, and upon the authorities discussed in the supporting and opposing memoranda filed in connection with plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration, the court has determined that plaintiffs’ financial information is not relevant to any outstanding issue in this litigation. See In re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation, MDL-250, Order No. 32 (N.D.Ill. May 5, 1978).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs’ motion for limited reconsideration is granted.
2. That portion of Order 19 ordering plaintiffs to produce certain financial information is vacated and Little Rock’s motion to compel the production of plaintiffs’ financial information is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9031329. Public record. Not legal advice.