# Bd. of Trs. of the Glazing Health & Welfare Trust v. Chambers

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 22, 2019 · 923 F.3d 1162

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9016239

## Case

- **Full name:** The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the GLAZING HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada Glaziers and Fabricators Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Pension Plan the Board of Trustees of the Painters, Glaziers and Floorcoverers Joint Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Trust the Board of Trustees of the Painters, Glaziers and Floorcoverers Safety Training Trust Fund the Board of Trustees of the Painters And Floorcoverers Joint Committee the Board of Trustees of the Southern Nevada Painters and Decorators and Glaziers Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust the Board of Trustees of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund the Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters' Trust the Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust the Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust the Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust the Board of Trustees of Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872Training Trust Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 525 Health and Welfare Trust and Plan Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Pension Plan Board of Trustees of Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union 525 Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust for Southern Nevada v. Shannon CHAMBERS, Nevada Labor Commissioner, in her official capacity
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 22, 2019
- **Citations:** 923 F.3d 1162
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Thomas
- **Judges:** Thomas
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9016239

## Opinion text

THOMAS, Chief Judge:
*1163 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9016239. Public record. Not legal advice.