# Williamson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · June 29, 1992 · 968 F.2d 380

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9001745

## Case

- **Full name:** J. MEADE WILLIAMSON AND F.D.I.B., INC. v. PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION and Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products Division, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., the Federal Aviation Administration, and United States of America v. BRADEN'S FLYING SERVICE, INC., Robert S. Mejia, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, Kenneth E. Davis, Robert M. Wreski and F.D.I.B. and Mil, Inc., Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, in No. 91-1621, Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., in No. 91-1686 Robert S. MEJIA v. PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, and Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products Division, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., and Penn Jersey Piper Sales, Inc., and Braden's Flying Service, Inc., and Kenneth E. Davis and Martin W. Wreski and Sherry M. Mraovich and Cynthia M. Penkava, United States of America v. J. MEADE WILLIAMSON, MIL, INC. and Future Directions in Banking, Inc. and F.D.I.B., Mil, Inc., and J. Meade Williamson, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, in No. 91-1622, Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., in No. 91-1687 J. Meade WILLIAMSON and F.D.I.B., Inc. v. PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products Division, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., Kenneth E. Davis and Robert M. Wreski v. UNITED STATES of America, Robert S. Mejia, Braden's Flying Service, Inc., Sherry M. Mraovich and Cynthia M. Penkava, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division v. F.D.I.B., MIL, INC. and Robert S. Mejia, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, in No. 91-1623, Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., in No. 91-1688 John T. KOCHIE, Jr. and Patricia Kochie, his wife v. PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Teledyne Industries, Inc., Penn Jersey Piper Sales, Inc., Braden's Flying Service, Inc., United States of America v. J. Meade WILLIAMSON, Kenneth E. Davis, Robert M. Wreski, Braden's Flying Service, Inc., Sherry M. Mraovich, Cynthia M. Penkava, United States, Parker Hannifin Corp., F.D.I.B., Mil, Inc., and F.D.I.B., Inc., Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, in No. 91-1624, Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., in No. 91-1689 William BERNHARD, III, Administrator of the Estate of William Bernhard, IV, Dec'd, and William Bernhard, III and Sandra Bernhard, in their own right v. PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. and Penn Jersey Piper Sales, Inc. v. J. Meade WILLIAMSON, Kenneth E. Davis, Robert M. Wreski, Braden's Flying Service, Inc., and Future Directions in Banking, Inc., t/a FDIB Corporation, United States of America, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, in No. 91-1625, Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., in No. 91-1690 Carol W. BELLWOAR v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS INC., Piper Aircraft Corp., Davis Aircraft Products, Inc., Braden's Flying Services, Inc., J. Meade Williamson v. UNITED STATES of America, Martin Wreski, Kenneth E. Davis, Sherry M. Mraovich, Cynthia M. Penkava, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, F.D.I.B. and Mil, Inc., F.D.I.B., Inc., Robert S. Mejia, J. Meade Williamson, United States of America, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, in No. 91-1626, Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft Products, a Division of Teledyne Industries, Inc., in No. 91-1691
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** June 29, 1992
- **Citations:** 968 F.2d 380
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Alito, Higginbotham, Hutchinson
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9001745

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
The petition for panel rehearing filed by appellant, Parker Hannifin, Airborne Division, in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9001745. Public record. Not legal advice.