# Stokes v. Singletary

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · January 27, 1992 · 952 F.2d 1567

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8996659

## Case

- **Full name:** Durham Eldon STOKES v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Florida Department of Corrections and Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, State of Florida
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** January 27, 1992
- **Citations:** 952 F.2d 1567; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1554
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Cox
- **Judges:** Birch, Cox, Gibson
- **Cited by:** 181 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8996659

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding parties’ dispute concerning defendant’s request for counsel immaterial to issue regarding Sixth Amendment right to counsel where defendant was appointed counsel at arraignment

## Opinion text

COX, Circuit Judge,
specially concurring:
I concur in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8996659. Public record. Not legal advice.