# Planned Parenthood of Southern Nevada, Inc. v. Clark County School District

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · August 5, 1991 · 941 F.2d 817

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8992590

## Case

- **Full name:** PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, INC. v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Members of the Board of School Trustees, individually and in their capacity as Trustees of the Clark County School District: Lucille Lusk, Dan Goldfarb, Patricia Bendorf, Virginia Brooks Brewster, Donald R. Faiss, Robert Forbuss, and Shirley Holst Robert Wentz, individually and in his capacity as Superintendent of Schools and the following principals: Lanny R. Lund A. Ray Morgan Brian O. Fox
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 5, 1991
- **Citations:** 941 F.2d 817
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Wallace
- **Judges:** Alarcon, Chambers, Fernandez, Goodwin, Hug, Norris, Poole, Pregerson, Rymer, Wallace, Wiggins
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8992590

## Opinion text

WALLACE, Circuit Judge,
with whom Circuit Judge CHAMBERS joins, concurring:
My opinion on behalf of the original panel affirmed the district court in reliance upon Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 , 108 S.Ct. 562 , 98 L.Ed.2d 592 (1988). See Planned Parenthood of Southern Nevada v. Clark County School District, 887 F.2d 935 (9th Cir.1989). Judge Rymer’s opinion analyzes the same issues and reaches the same outcome. I concur for the reasons stated in the original panel opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8992590. Public record. Not legal advice.