# Lundblad v. Celeste

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · January 31, 1991 · 924 F.2d 627

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8986535

## Case

- **Full name:** Steven LUNDBLAD v. Richard F. CELESTE, Dorothy Shoemaker, William Napier and Donald Olson, in their official capacities, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Ronald James, Deputy Director
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 31, 1991
- **Citations:** 924 F.2d 627; 1991 WL 8568
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Ryan
- **Judges:** Boggs, Guy, Jones, Keith, Kennedy, Krupansky, Martin, Merritt, Milburn, Nelson, Norris, Ryan, Suhrheinrich, Wellford
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8986535

## Opinion text

RYAN, Circuit Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the court’s opinion, except for parts II-C and IV of the reinstated portion of the panel opinion. As to those parts, I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Lundblad v. Celeste, 874 F.2d 1097, 1100 (6th Cir.1989).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8986535. Public record. Not legal advice.