# Dynamics Corp. of America v. CTS Corp.

> Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · November 3, 1986 · 805 F.2d 705

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8946132

## Case

- **Full name:** DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a New York corporation v. CTS CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- **Decided:** November 3, 1986
- **Citations:** 805 F.2d 705; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33228
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Cudahy
- **Judges:** Bauer, Cudahy, Dahy, Posner
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed on other grounds by CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America, 481 U.S. 69 (1987).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8946132

## Opinion text

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
Certainly I have no objection to a remand to explore the various matters the majority so ably delineates. In any event, remand will likely have little practical impact on a “poison pill” which expires next April.
I write separately only to note that we are dealing here first and foremost with a district court’s determination of good faith in the context of a preliminary injunction. A finding of good faith can sometimes amount to something greater than the sum of its parts. Hence I would now and ultimately be adequately deferential to the findings of as experienced and knowledgeable a jurist as Judge Getzendanner.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8946132. Public record. Not legal advice.