# Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.

> Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 30, 1985 · 764 F.2d 76

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8932057

## Case

- **Full name:** Richard MEYER, as custodian for Pamela Meyer v. OPPENHEIMER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Oppenheimer Asset Management Corporation, Oppenheimer. & Co., Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc., A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc., Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc., J.C. Bradford & Co., Centennial Capital Corporation, and Daily Cash Accumulation Fund, Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- **Decided:** May 30, 1985
- **Citations:** 764 F.2d 76; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31343
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Graafeiland
- **Judges:** Feinberg, Graafeiland
- **Cited by:** 38 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8932057

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- recognizing a private cause of action under § 15(f)

## Opinion text

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge,
concurring:
Although I would have preferred to defer to Judge Sofaer’s interpretation of the settlement agreement, I can appreciate my colleagues’ unwillingness to decide the issue of the agreement’s scope on a motion addressed to the complaint.
However, if the settlement agreement was not intended to cover administrative services, something which Judge Sofaer is in the best position to know, I am not prepared to open the door to harassing discovery by the plaintiff on the question whether the fees provided for in the settlement agreement have remained “fair.”
With this reservation, I concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8932057. Public record. Not legal advice.