# William Kemph v. W. F. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 5, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/892434

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 5, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/892434

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6122

WILLIAM T. KEMPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

W. F. BROWN, Detective; TOWN OF VINTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:12-cv-00430-GEC)

Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 5, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Timothy Kemph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

William Timothy Kemph appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing without prejudice as legally frivolous his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, ∗ see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(1),

1367(c) (2006), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Kemph v. Brown, No. 7:12-cv-00430-GEC (W.D. Va. Nov. 8,

2012; Jan. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗
We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no
amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by
the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/892434. Public record. Not legal advice.