# Automobile Club of Michigan v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · December 11, 1979 · 610 F.2d 438

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8910601

## Case

- **Full name:** AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF MICHIGAN, Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, Motor Land Insurance Company and Group Insurance Company of Michigan v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Michigan AAA Sales Association, Inc., Intervener
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 11, 1979
- **Citations:** 610 F.2d 438
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8910601

## Opinion text

ORDER
This case is before the court on petition to review and cross-petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding petitioners in violation of § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(1). The Board predicated its conclusions on a finding that petitioner discharged certain employees for issuing a press release concerning a lawsuit which they had filed against petitioners. The Board concluded that the issuance of this press release was a protected concerted activity under § 7 of the Act and that petitioners’ discharge of these employees for engaging in that activity violated § 8(a)(1) of the Act. The Board’s decision and order is reported at 231 NLRB No. 99 and these petitions are properly before the court since the alleged unfair labor practice occurred in Detroit, Michigan. 29 U.S.C. §§ 160 (e) and (f).
This court, having reviewed the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties and the court being fully advised in the premises finding the Board’s findings to be supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, its inferences fair, and its conclusions not contrary to law, Accordingly,
It is ORDERED that the decision and order of the Board be and hereby is enforced in full.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8910601. Public record. Not legal advice.