# United States v. Mandel

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 20, 1979 · 602 F.2d 653

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8910099

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Marvin MANDEL, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. W. Dale HESS, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Harry W. RODGERS, III, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. William A. RODGERS, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Irvin KOVENS, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Ernest N. CORY, Jr.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 20, 1979
- **Citations:** 602 F.2d 653
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Butzner, Hall, Haynsworth, Phillips, Russell, Widener
- **Cited by:** 65 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8910099

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the declarants’ unidentified status precluded compliance with the notice provision and consequently rendered the statements inadmissible under Rule 807

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
The judgments of conviction are affirmed by an equally divided court.
A majority of the members of the en banc court would affirm the judgments of conviction against all of the contentions of the appellants except the claim of error in the charge to the jury which was the point upon which there was equal division.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8910099. Public record. Not legal advice.