# Farr v. Board of Adjustment

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · March 18, 1986 · 79 N.C. App. 754

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8908192

## Case

- **Full name:** VIRGINIA M. FARR v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** March 18, 1986
- **Citations:** 79 N.C. App. 754; 340 S.E.2d 521; 1986 N.C. App. LEXIS 2125
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hedrick
- **Judges:** Becton, Hedrick, Phillips
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8908192

## Opinion text

Chief Judge HEDRICK
dissenting.
In my opinion, the zoning ordinance in question is not unconstitutional. I do not believe the majority has addressed the principal issue raised on appeal as to whether the occupancy of the accessory building as a residence by the petitioner’s son is a violation of the ordinance. The facts found by the zoning board support the conclusion that the occupancy of the accessory building by the petitioner’s son is in violation of the ordinance. I vote to affirm the decision of the superior court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8908192. Public record. Not legal advice.