# Brady v. Fulghum

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1983 · 62 N.C. App. 99

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8905129

## Case

- **Full name:** COITE P. BRADY, d/b/a BRADY BUILDING COMPANY v. EDWIN M. FULGHUM, JR. and wife, PATRICIA M. FULGHUM
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** May 3, 1983
- **Citations:** 62 N.C. App. 99; 302 S.E.2d 4; 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2807
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Vaughn
- **Judges:** Eagles, Vaughn, Webb
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8905129

## Opinion text

Chief Judge VAUGHN
dissenting.
I would hold, as we did in Barrett, Robert & Woods, Inc. v. Armi 59 N.C. App. 134 , 296 S.E. 2d 10 , review denied, 307 N.C. 269 , 299 S.E. 2d 214 (1982), that the protective policy of the statute was realized by plaintiffs substantial compliance with the licensing provision.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8905129. Public record. Not legal advice.