# Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · June 3, 1980 · 47 N.C. App. 203

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8903429

## Case

- **Full name:** BEN LLOYD v. CARNATION COMPANY, GARY WILLIER, and WARREN MANUEL
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** June 3, 1980
- **Citations:** 47 N.C. App. 203; 266 S.E.2d 722; 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3003
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Hill
- **Judges:** Arnold, Hill, Martin, Robert
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8903429

## Opinion text

HILL, Judge.
Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231 , 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788 , 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724 , 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).
For failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants’ appeal is
Dismissed.
Judges Martin (Robert M.) and Arnold concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8903429. Public record. Not legal advice.