# State v. Quick

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · April 16, 2013 · 226 N.C. App. 541

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8901409

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ISHMAEL LAMAR QUICK
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** April 16, 2013
- **Citations:** 226 N.C. App. 541; 739 S.E.2d 608; 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 387; 2013 WL 1571060
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Steelman
- **Judges:** Calabria, Hunter, Robert, Steelman
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8901409

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- declining to address the State’s argument when “it was not raised at the trial court hearing”

## Opinion text

STEELMAN, Judge,
concurring.
I concur with the result reached by the majority in that the State fails to challenge the facts found by the trial court, and those facts support the conclusions of law reached by the trial court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8901409. Public record. Not legal advice.