# McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States District Court

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 27, 1975 · 523 F.2d 1083

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8897465

## Case

- **Full name:** McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent Geraldine L. FLANAGAN, Real Parties in Interest UNITED STATES of America v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent Geraldine L. FLANAGAN, Real Parties in Interest Geraldine L. FLANAGAN v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant Geraldine L. FLANAGAN v. United States
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 27, 1975
- **Citations:** 523 F.2d 1083; 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 11; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14531
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Chambers, Consideration, Disposition, Ely, Hufstedler, Kennedy, Schnacke, Suggestion, Wallace, Wright
- **Cited by:** 26 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8897465

## Opinion text

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for an en banc hearing. An active judge called for an en banc vote and a majority of the judges of the court has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).
Judge Ely did not participate in the consideration or disposition of the suggestion for en banc rehearing.
The suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8897465. Public record. Not legal advice.