# Wade v. Town of Ayden

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · March 18, 1997 · 125 N.C. App. 650

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8893927

## Case

- **Full name:** THOMAS H. WADE SANDRA WADE WILLIAM S. HOLLAND BARBARA B. HOLLAND ELIZABETH A. WHITE CHARLES F. WHITE REUBEN HILL WANDA HILL HAL TILL BRENDA TILL GLADYS PIERCE JULIAN PIERCE JOEY PIERCE B.P. MOSELEY ANN MOSELEY ADDIE ALLEGOOD DOROTHY DOLLBERG MARY ALICE DAVENPORT LOU ELLEN SANDERS RONALD J. KWIATKOWSKI MARY V. KWIATKOWSKI DAVID WATTS EDNA HOOKS IMELDA A. STANG BROWNIE EDWARDS JEFFREY FARRELL SHERI SMITH JANIECE JOYNER JAMES R. ROBINSON JACKIE ROBINSON W.E. PHILLIPS LENA PHILLIPS CLIFFORD A. STANG ROBERT SCOTT CHARLIE B. DAVENPORT MARJORIE HARRINGTON STEPHEN L. JOYNER JACK CRAFT STEVE H. BOSWELL JACKIE H. BOSWELL JOE SMITH WYNN NOBLES JUANITA NOBLES WANDA L. FAISON SUE TAYLOR O.W. BABCOCK, JR. RUTH BABCOCK LOUIS W. THIEL HAZEL THIEL WILLIAM STATON, III SPENCER E. GAY MEREDITH ELLIS JANICE ELLIS JUDY EDWARDS v. TOWN OF AYDEN, a body politic and MARVIN BALDREE, Mayor J.J. BROWN, Mayor Pro-Tem STEVE TRIPP, DAVID WEBB, DON WILSON and CARL SPEIGHT, Commissioners and ROBERT D. PARROTT, Trustee for Hart Heirs
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** March 18, 1997
- **Citations:** 125 N.C. App. 650; 482 S.E.2d 44; 1997 N.C. App. LEXIS 229
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Walker
- **Judges:** Greene, McGee, Walker
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8893927

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding when ordinance language is clear, courts must give language its plain meaning

## Opinion text

Judge Walker
concurring.
I am unable to conclude that the applicant Parrott has complied with Section 155-31(C) (2) of the Ordinance; i.e., no site plan is included in the record. However, I do not construe the Ordinance to require the applicant to submit detailed architectural and engineering drawings. Instead, the plans and required conditions must be sufficiently complete to allow for thorough review and enable the Town to insure compliance with the conditional use permit once issued.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8893927. Public record. Not legal advice.