# Haddigan v. Harkins

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · November 23, 1970 · 441 F.2d 844

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8885264

## Case

- **Full name:** John J. HADDIGAN, Administrator of the Estate of Margaret M. Haddigan v. Cornelius J. HARKINS and William Thomas Baker v. Thomas W. HADDIGAN, Third-Party Cornelius J. Harkins, in 18,341, William Thomas Baker, in 18,342, Thomas W. Haddigan, Third-Party in 18,343
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** November 23, 1970
- **Citations:** 441 F.2d 844; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6279
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Aldisert, Gibbons
- **Cited by:** 38 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8885264

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the trial court did not err in admitting testimony from an employment agency proprietor who estimated the value of the decedent’s household services at $173.25 per week by applying prevailing hourly rates for comparable roles, such as hostess, seamstress, and hous…

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
The petition for rehearing filed by William Thomas Baker, Appellant in 18,-342 in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the Petition for Rehearing of petitioner William Thomas Baker.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8885264. Public record. Not legal advice.