# Bullock v. Latham

> Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · December 23, 1964 · 339 F.2d 605

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8870049

## Case

- **Full name:** Giles E. BULLOCK and Katherine D. Bullock v. Dana LATHAM, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and E. C. Coyle, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- **Decided:** December 23, 1964
- **Citations:** 339 F.2d 605
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8870049

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
When this case was here before we held that there was jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. §§ 1340 and 2463 and remanded for trial on the sole issue “whether title to-the machinery and fixtures is in Giles E. Bullock or E. C. Brown Company.” Bullock v. Latham, 306 F.2d 45, 48 (2d Cir. 1962). This task was thoroughly and', competently performed by the District. Court Judge, who ruled against the taxpayers. We affirm on the basis of his-, findings of fact and conclusions of law.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8870049. Public record. Not legal advice.