# Rice & Hutchins, Inc. v. Vera Shoe Co.

> Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · April 2, 1923 · 290 F. 124

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8830963

## Case

- **Full name:** RICE & HUTCHINS, Inc. v. VERA SHOE CO., Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- **Decided:** April 2, 1923
- **Citations:** 290 F. 124; 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 1759
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Mayer
- **Judges:** Manton, Mayer
- **Cited by:** 34 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8830963

## Opinion text

MAYER, Circuit Judge
(dissenting). I agree with the view of the facts entertained by the District Court, and hence that the case is ruled by United Drug Co. v. Rectanus Co., 248 U. S. 90 , 39 Sup. Ct. 48, 63 L. Ed. 421 . I think the decree below was right.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8830963. Public record. Not legal advice.