# Skilbeck v. Andreasen

> Appellate Court of Illinois · April 15, 1914 · 186 Ill. App. 368

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8819546

## Case

- **Full name:** Skilbeck and Brown v. Hans Andreasen
- **Court:** Appellate Court of Illinois
- **Decided:** April 15, 1914
- **Citations:** 186 Ill. App. 368
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Dibell
- **Judges:** Dibell
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8819546

## Opinion text

Mr. Justice Dibell delivered the opinion of the court.
2. Appeal and ebbob, § 472 * —necessity of preserving objection to questions asked of witness by court. Though section 81 of the Practice Act, as amended in 1911, J & A. ¶ 8618, does away with the necessity for preserving an exception, it is still the law that counsel considering themselves injured by question asked of a witness by the court must object thereto and give the trial judge an opportunity to withdraw the objectionable question. Whitney, J., took no part in this decision.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8819546. Public record. Not legal advice.