# Lloyd v. Locklear

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 20, 2016 · 669 F. App'x 691

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8681004

## Case

- **Full name:** Wendell D. LLOYD v. Dean LOCKLEAR, Superintendent, New Hanover Correctional Officer Hoffler North Carolina Department of Public Safety Inmate Grievance Resolution Board
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 20, 2016
- **Citations:** 669 F. App'x 691
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Floyd, King, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8681004

## Opinion text

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Wendell D. Lloyd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lloyd’s motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Locklear, No. 5:15-ct-03262-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8681004. Public record. Not legal advice.