# Meredith v. Russell County School Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 4, 2016 · 669 F. App'x 122

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8680887

## Case

- **Full name:** Kenneth MEREDITH v. RUSSELL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, d/b/a Russell County Public Schools
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 4, 2016
- **Citations:** 669 F. App'x 122
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Gregory, King, Traxler
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8680887

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that a party seeking recusal must set forth “sufficiently definite and particular” facts “to convince a reasonable person that bias exists”

## Opinion text

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Meredith appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in Meredith’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action in which Meredith asserted a First Amendment retaliation claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Meredith v. Russell Cty. Sch. Bd., 133 F.Supp.3d 838 (W.D. Va.2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8680887. Public record. Not legal advice.