# Brown v. Ratledge

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 28, 2016 · 669 F. App'x 101

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8680876

## Case

- **Full name:** Joseph A. BROWN v. Charles RATLEDGE, Warden-USP Lee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 28, 2016
- **Citations:** 669 F. App'x 101
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Duncan, Floyd, Harris
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8680876

## Opinion text

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph A. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Ratledge, No. 7:15-cv-00640-EKD-RSD (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015). We deny as moot Brown’s motion to expedite his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this *102 court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8680876. Public record. Not legal advice.