# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 22, 2015 · 627 F. App'x 218

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8678736

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Jermaine BROWN, a/k/a Jeezy
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 22, 2015
- **Citations:** 627 F. App'x 218
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Diaz, Hamilton, Harris
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8678736

## Opinion text

*219 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jermaine Brown appeals from the district court’s orders construing his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, Nos. 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-10; 4:13-cv-00041-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015; June 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8678736. Public record. Not legal advice.